logo

Home / Stats / Contact Me / Login / Recommended Links
by marleed


Answer: ... a good start!  I'm not ready to give a lot of credit to the Obama administration for the success of this mission.  I'm grateful that it ended well, but I also believe it should have ended sooner.  It is also important to remember that there are dozens of hostages still in the custody of these thugs.  It is time that this problem was addressed.  If the World isn't willing, then the United States and anyone else who's willing must formulate and execute a plan to rid the planet  of this scourge . . . and I DO mean *execute* . . . hold the negotiations!

I very much enjoyed Michael Eden's views on the event and encourage you to read his entire piece on the subject.

We’re at a point of ideologically-controlled media propaganda where American servicemen can literally kill a thousand of the enemy, but lose one American, and still be portrayed as the losers.  We saw that in Iraq under President Bush.

I think we should celebrate the rescue of Captain Phillips, and celebrate the heroism and skill of our incredible warriors.  But let’s not celebrate by way of political spin out of Washington and picked up by the media establishment, because it’s an incredibly dangerous game.  If Obama deserves credit for the rescue yesterday, then he will therefore fully deserve to be excoriated if any Americans are killed in future reprisals.

On a final note, a Democrat member of Congress, Donald Payne from New Jersey, went on a “fact-finding” tour of Somalia that was itself very likely an act of political grandstanding.  His airplane was attacked (unsuccessfully) with mortars as it was preparing to take off.  The al-Qaeda-linked Islamist militant group al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the mortar attack.

Barack Obama may want to end the “war on terror” by assigning it the incredibly euphemistically-named “overseas contingency operation,” but it is a war on terror nevertheless - a war that demands the total participation of our military, and a war that will necessarily require both courage and sacrifice from the United States if we have any hope to prevail.  I hope President Obama will abandon this incredibly foolish politically-correct re-labeling and treat this war with the seriousness that it deserves.



04/13/2009, 18:01
3 comments 3 comments ( 354 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


Please take some time to brush up on this subject.

Ruthless, unconventional foes are not new to the United States of America. More than two hundred years ago the newly established United States made its first attempt to fight an overseas battle to protect its private citizens by building an international coalition against an unconventional enemy. Then the enemies were pirates and piracy. The focus of the United States and a proposed international coalition was the Barbary Pirates of North Africa.

Pirate ships and crews from the North African states of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers (the Barbary Coast) were the scourge of the Mediterranean. Capturing merchant ships and holding their crews for ransom provided the rulers of these nations with wealth and naval power. In fact, the Roman Catholic Religious Order of Mathurins had operated from France for centuries with the special mission of collecting and disbursing funds for the relief and ransom of prisoners of Mediterranean pirates.

I STRONGLY recommend that you read the entire article (it's not that long!)  These are lessons we should have already learned.  We've been down this road before.  Any questions?


04/09/2009, 11:30
3 comments 3 comments ( 35 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


I was going to do a Somali Pirate update after pirates hijacked a cargo ship with an American crew of 21.  But in a fit of good old American determination and ingenuity, the American crew seized control back from the Islamic barbarians.  At last report, at least three of the so called pirates were in the water.

UPDATE:

According to the ship's crew, Somali terrorists are still holding one American crew member hostage.  Earlier reports indicated that the hostage is the captain of the vessel and that he's being held not on the ship but in a life boat.  An updated report can be found here. This is the first time in 200 years that an American flagged ship has been the victim of piracy.  It is an indication that far from being under control, the situation off the east coast of Africa remains volatile at best.

THURSDAY UPDATE:

The USS Bainbridge has arrived on the scene and the FBI is engaged in negotiations with the terrorists.  (I thought we didn't negotiate with terrorists)

Mogadishu, Somalia (AHN) - FBI hostage negotiators have arrived at the scene in the Indian Ocean where the captain of the briefly hijacked container ship, the Alabama, is still being held hostage in a lifeboat by four armed pirates.

Hostage negotiators are aboard the USS Bainbridge naval destroyer warship, which is near the Alabama and its lifeboat. Naval authorities have been conducting constant surveillance.

The ship's 28-foot lifeboat is reportedly out of fuel and drifting. The captain is in radio contact with his ship, but the batteries won't last forever. There is enough water for three days and food for 10 days, according to reports.

And words of assurance from our fearless leader on the subject.

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama has declined to answer a question about the hostage situation off the coast of Somalia.

The president was asked about the incident as he met with U.S. homeowners about refinancing mortgages. At the close of a Roosevelt Room event, the president was asked by a reporter if he were concerned about the piracy incident.

Obama responded: "Guys, we're talking about housing right now."

Reporters were then ushered out of the room as they usually are after such events.

Obama has yet to comment publicly on the incident.

... Woops, I guess there's nothing on the teleprompter yet!


04/08/2009, 13:18
2 comments 2 comments ( 166 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


While I'll stipulate that the United States government is not a theocracy, I'm unwilling to agree with the claim that we do not think of ourselves as a Christian nation.  Our Founding Fathers were largely men of faith and our laws have their roots in Judeo-Christian philosophies and teachings.  We do not need to be ashamed of our heritage nor deny it.  The secular character of our government with its freedom for citizens to worship as they please (or not worship at all) is important and necessary to the melting pot nature of who we are as a nation.  But make no mistake about it this nation was founded on the belief that the rights we all share are God given by the One who created us all.

"Resistance to tyranny becomes the Christian and social duty of each individual. ... Continue steadfast and, with a proper sense of your dependence on God, nobly defend those rights which heaven gave, and no man ought to take from us."  -- John Hancock

04/06/2009, 14:16
1 comment 1 comment ( 22 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


I was unaware that one of the functions of the President of The United States was to travel abroad and debase the nation. (catchy title for a TV show starring Barry O!...  Debase the Nation)  In the interest of fairness, after trashing the United States he goes on to give a tongue lashing to Europe, telling them they sometimes don't appreciate us for the good we do.  I think both comments were a mistake.  Furthermore I want to know how it is that B.H. Obama has the ... nerve ... the unmitigated GALL  to call ANYONE arrogant!?  You want arrogant, Barack?  I'll show you arrogant.











America DOES have an arrogance problem, Mr. Obama!  It's YOU!

04/04/2009, 11:16
1 comment 1 comment ( 19 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


On April 15, be part of the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) party rally in your community

04/02/2009, 16:24
1 comment 1 comment ( 21 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]


Back Next

powered by pppBLOG v 0.3.11