logo

Home / Stats / Contact Me / Login / Recommended Links
by marleed


.  .  .  Well, actually he almost certainly is.  But if nothing else he's also not feeling the love the the Obama administration is trying to share.

SEOUL, South Korea -- North Korea took its first swipe at President Barack Obama on Wednesday, accusing his administration of meddling, though the communist country somewhat toned down its recent harsh, military rhetoric.

North Korea has been highly critical of the United States in recent weeks, accusing it of using annual military exercises with South Korea to prepare for an invasion, a claim Washington denies.

Also stoking tensions has been the North's intention to fire a rocket, which it says will be a satellite but that South Korea and other governments believe will be a test of a long-range missile capable of striking U.S. territory.

"The new administration of the U.S. is now working hard to infringe upon the sovereignty" of North Korea "by force of arms," the North's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that also accused Obama's government of "seriously interfering in its internal affairs" in both "words and deeds."

I guess that Kumbaya foreign policy isn't working out very well for BHO.  Apparently it's incredibly difficult to convince a raving lunatic that you really, really, really want to be his new BFF. Who knew?  But personally, I don't think Mr. Il has anything to worry about.  There's a pretty good chance that President Obama wouldn't attack North Korea even if Pajama Boy lobbed a nuke at Alaska.  War, justified or not, angers Obama's base.  And we all know that there's nothing worse than an angry base .  .  .  unless, of course, you happen to live in Alaska!

03/11/2009, 20:14
2 comments 2 comments ( 216 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


Look at the headline I tripped over this morning!

U.S. House of Representatives Quietly Scraps Plan to become 'Carbon Neural'

I'm not exactly sure what went wrong, but the dial on my hypocrisy meter is spinning again!

Washington (AP) - It was a bold promise: the House would "lead by example" to fight global warming, becoming the first legislative body in the world to zero out its carbon impact on the planet. But the promise may have been too bold.
 
The House quietly shelved the idea late last month, the word delivered in an e-mail to a couple of reporters. It turned out that the House's goal to become carbon neutral -- by removing as much carbon dioxide from the air as it releases -- could not be guaranteed.

So let me get this straight.  In the name of saving the world, the country, and the environment (yes, I know there's a little overlap there) . . . We are supposed to dial down the thermostat, trade in our Crown Victoria for a Schwinn and cheerfully handover a larger percentage of our paycheck to BHO so he can redistribute it.  While back in Washington D.C. you could grow orchids in the White House, members of Congress are being chauffeured to work in limos, and it turns out that almost no one in the current administration bothers to pay taxes at all! 

IN YOUR DREAMS!


03/10/2009, 12:17
1 comment 1 comment ( 22 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


.  .  .  Love the one you're with!



As liberals go, Joe Lieberman has always seemed like a decent man.  I was a bit disappointed in him for agreeing to be on the ticket with Al Gore in 2000 but I wrote it off to being a bit star struck.  Now I'm not so sure.  Joe is once again singing a different tune than he was six months ago.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Joe Lieberman has changed his tune on Barack Obama. After campaigning across the country for Republican John McCain in 2008 and attacking Obama as naive, untested and unwilling to take on powerful special interests, Lieberman now showers praise on the popular new Democratic president.

"He's shown real leadership," Lieberman told The Associated Press in an interview. "Bottom line: I think Barack Obama, president of the United States, is off to a very good start."

The Connecticut independent, who faces re-election in 2012 in a state where Obama is popular, is eager to mend fences with Democrats still fuming over his criticism of Obama during the general election campaign.

Lieberman has applauded Obama's national security team. He gushed over Obama's "inspirational and unifying" inaugural. Lieberman even played a key role helping Obama win Senate passage of the economic stimulus plan.

As if to underscore the point, Lieberman has even clashed on the Senate floor with his pal McCain over the stimulus plan and a District of Columbia voting rights bill.

"I don't think of Joe as the independent, I really think of Joe as a Democrat," said Lieberman's home state colleague, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

It's a striking turnaround from the days when Lieberman was a fixture at McCain's side during campaign stops. McCain had even considered making Lieberman, who nearly won the vice presidency on the Democratic ticket with Al Gore in 2000, his running mate.

"Do I think it is more principle or politics?" said Quinnipiac University Poll director Doug Schwartz of Lieberman's moves. "It is a tough question."

Lieberman's campaigning for McCain hurt him with Connecticut voters, particularly Democrats, Schwartz said.

Connecticut's Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who is mentioned as a possible 2012 Senate Democratic candidate, would beat Lieberman by 28 points in a hypothetical matchup, a recent Quinnipiac poll showed.

Lieberman scoffed at any suggestion his embrace of Obama is more about political expediency than principle.

"I haven't changed ... I've always had a voting record that is more with the Democrats than with the Republicans," he said.

While it is true that Lieberman has never claimed to be a Republican, he seemed pretty convincing in his support of John McCain in the 2008 election. Read what Joe had to say on the subject in August of 2008.

“In my opinion, the choice could not be more clear: between one candidate, John McCain, who’s had experience, been tested in war and tried in peace, another candidate who has not,’’ Mr. Lieberman said. “Between one candidate, John McCain, who has always put the country first, worked across party lines to get things done, and one candidate who has not. Between one candidate who’s a talker, and the other candidate who’s the leader America needs as our next president."

So what's changed?  It appears that it was politically expedient for Joe to change his mind about B.H. Obama .  .  . apparently being chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee is worth the price of your soul.  So give me liberty or give me death, if it doesn't cost me politically.  Who needs stinkin' principles anyway!

UPDATE (sort of)

Ok, now I can't get that song out of my head!  So for your enjoyment (especially those of you too young to remember the 60's)  here's a little CSN!

Enjoy!




03/09/2009, 11:21
2 comments 2 comments ( 20 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


Protests across the country continue.  Many more are planned.  However, it seems the MSM hasn't noticed.

Coverage of "tea party" protests in various cities around the country (this March 4 Pajamas Media press release, HT to FreeRepublic, cited 22 locations on February 27 and seven this weekend) has been sparse to non-existent, especially at major establishment media outlets.

Most notably, based on a seach on "tea party" (not in quotes) at its ap.org home page at about 10:00 a.m., there has been no coverage of this weekend's or last weekend's protests by the Associated Press, the self-described "essential global news network":

What's more, even though over 20 of the protests had already taken place, the AP's David Bauder, in his coverage of a dispute over the prominent use of CNBC's Rick ("Rant Hear 'Round the world") Santelli's name at a protest web site (the March 2, 8:06 p.m. item above), either did not know that the protests had occurred, or didn't care to inform his readers that they had.

Looking at this weekend's coverage thus far, a 10:15 a.m. Google News search on "tea party" for March 7-8 (in quotes, sorted by date with duplicates included), returned only 47 items (the over 1,500 results claim at the top of the first page of the results is wrong; scroll to the bottom to see that there are only 5 pages of results). Roughly a quarter of them are unrelated to the protests; most of the rest are from local publications and TV stations results. One exception is Michelle Malkin's column ("The Wealth Battlefield") in the Washington Times.

I guess the dinosaur media is too busy admiring Michelle Obama's well toned arms to notice.  The truth is, the size and scope of the "Tea Party" protests are growing.  Check here for updates. and remember .  .  .  just because you couldn't find it in the newspaper, doesn't mean it didn't happen.

The 15,000 people who turned out to protest in Fullerton, California assure you .  .  .  it's happening!


03/08/2009, 12:53
1 comment 1 comment ( 18 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed

If you're going to provide for my every need, why would I want to work for a living? No one has ever adequately answered that question .  .  .  not even the Chosen One!

03/07/2009, 13:32

by marleed

And just to prove that the Obama, Gordon Brown gift exchange debacle wasn't an aberration,  here's another tale of diplomatic embarrassment.  Hillary Clinton is in Geneva holding first time talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, where it didn't take long for things to take an awkward turn.


GENEVA—Secretary of State Hillary Clinton opened her first extended talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov by giving him a present meant to symbolize the Obama administration’s vow to “press the reset button” on U.S.-Russia relations.

She handed a palm-sized box wrapped with a bow. Lavrov opened it and pulled out the gift: a red button on a black base with a Russian word peregruzka printed on top. 

“We worked hard to get the right Russian word. Do you think we got it?” Clinton asked. 

“You got it wrong,” Lavrov said. 

Instead of "reset," Lavrov said the word on the box meant “overcharge.” 

Clinton and Lavrov laughed. 

“We won’t let you do that to us,” she said. Trying to recover, Clinton said the new administration was serious about improving relations with Moscow. “We mean it, and we’re looking forward to it.” 

Lavrov said he would put the button on his desk and he and Clinton pushed the button together, before sitting down for their meeting.

A State Department official said the misspelling on the button was being corrected, in time for the post-meeting news conference.

Details, details!  No big deal.  After all it was only a stupid little button .  .  .  this time! But what's next?


03/06/2009, 17:43


Back Next

powered by pppBLOG v 0.3.11