logo

Home / Stats / Contact Me / Login / Recommended Links
by marleed


So B. Hussein Obama stands up in front of God and the entire world last night and says:  "Spend spend spend, free stuff free stuff, bail out bail out, balance the budget, no more earmarks, and oh yeah, tax the hell out of the rich!"  (I've taken a little poetic license here)  I hope you heard the "no more earmarks" claim because next on the agenda for our fabulously liberal Congress and their bookend President is a 410 billion dollar "Omnibus Spending Bill".  Not just *any* omnibus spending bill, mind you.  This one is top of the line, replete with 9,000 earmarks! (how quickly they forget!)

You want earmarks? There are lots and lots and lots of earmarks in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill coming down the road. Not that any of the people who are going to vote for it will actually read it, of course. If they did, they couldn’t look into the camera and sanctimoniously declare that, uh, you know, “There are no earmarks.”

The Modesto Bee reports:

During the 2008 presidential campaign, candidates Barack Obama and John McCain fought vigorously over who would be toughest on congressional earmarks.

“We need earmark reform,” Obama said in September during a presidential debate in Oxford, Miss. “And when I’m president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely.”

President Barack Obama should prepare to carve out a lot of free time and keep the coffee hot this week as Congress prepares to unveil a $410 billion omnibus spending bill that’s riddled with thousands of earmarks, despite his calls for restraint and efforts on Capitol Hill to curtail the practice.

The bill will contain about 9,000 earmarks totaling $5 billion, congressional officials say. Many of the earmarks — loosely defined as local projects inserted by members of Congress — were inserted last year as the spending bills worked their way through various committees.

So while Obama and McCain were slamming earmarks on the camp aign trail, House and Senate members — Democrats and Republicans — were slapping them into spending bills.

“It will be a little embarrassing for the president if he signs a bill with that many earmarks on it,” said Stan Collender, a veteran Washington budget analyst.

Hill staffer Tom Jones is going through the omnibus spending bill with a fine-tooth comb, and Twittering his earmark findings, including:

* $200,000 for “Tattoo Removal Violence Prevention Outreach Program,” pg. 283;

*Maine lobster earmark in the omnibus, pg. 173;

*$5.8 million earmark for the “Ted Kennedy Institute for the Senate…for the planning and design of a building & an endowment,” pg. 232;

*and National Council of La Raza, $473,000 earmark from Sens. Bingaman and Menendez, pg. 212.


Time to get your dialing fingers ready, and fire up your email program. Don't take this lying down (or bending over!) BHO believes we're not a nation of quitters.  .  .  Let's show him that on that one detail, he's right!

UPDATE:
The House passed the 410 billion dollar Omnibus Bill by a vote of 245-178.

The House has passed a $410 billion spending package on a largely party line vote, sending the delayed appropriations package to the Senate despite Republican complaints about having no say in crafting the legislation.

The vote was 245-178, with 20 Democrats voting “no” while 16 Republicans voted in favor of the bill. The great majority of Republicans voted against the spending package in a continued show of party unity after the GOP rallied en masse against the $787 billions stimulus that was signed into law last week.

Covering more than a dozen Cabinet departments, the omnibus spending bill adds another $20.5 billion to last year’s domestic spending requests for the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. Overall, the 2009 spending bills represent a 6.7 percent increase over 2008.

Republicans complained about both earmarks and the fact that they had little influence in crafting the legislation.



The 16 Republicans who voted for this bacon wrapped pork roast are: Mack Bono, Brown-Waite, Cao, Capito, Castle, Dent, Emerson, Gerlach, LoBiondo, McHugh, Miller (MI), Tim Murphy, Reichert, Upton, Whitfield, and Young (AK).  If you helped elect one of them, please jot them a note or give them a call.  The Senate may take up the bill this week, but has not scheduled a vote.  Stay tuned for more details.

02/25/2009, 10:26
5 comments 5 comments ( 54 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


The Washington Post has an interesting initial "fact check" of BHO's eloquent, if less than truthful State of The Union address.  I think you'll find it useful, so I'm going to quote it in its entirety.

9:20 p.m.
"We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before."

According to the Energy Information Administration, the official keeper of energy stats for the U.S. Department of Energy, oil imports to the U.S. fell through 2008 and demand is projected to continue to fall through 2009. --Frank Ahrens

9:23 p.m.
"Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs."

That was the estimate for the size of the stimulus package President Obama asked for of more than $830 billion. But as the package was whittled down in Congress to $787 billion, Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, and other outside analysts have lowered their projections to just more than 2 million jobs saved or created.
--Frank Ahrens

9:27 p.m.
"You should also know that the money you've deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; and you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system."

If you have more than $250,000 in a bank, it is not necessarily covered by federal insurance. Further, insurance companies are struggling and state guarantee pools have only limited coverage.--Frank Ahrens

9:27 p.m.
"Too many bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the books of too many banks."

Banks actually created pools of loans or bought loans for profit. Bad loans did not wander onto balance sheets by themselves.--Frank Ahrens

9:41 p.m.
"As for our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect them from their own bad practices."

This is part of the story. The other part is trade barriers set up by foreign nations to limit the import of U.S. vehicles. South Korea, for instance, has until recently been a market largely closed to Detroit automakers, thanks to high tariffs, while Americans bought Hyundais and Kias by the thousands.--Frank Ahrens

"And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it."

It's doubtful that President Obama is referring here to Germany, home of Karl Friedrich Benz, inventor of the first true, four-wheel, gasoline-powered, internal-combustion-engine auto, or his contemporary, Gottlieb Wilhelm Daimler, who did same. America -- Henry Ford -- invented mass production of the auto.--Frank Ahrens

From earlier in the speech
"A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn't afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway."

By pairing it with the Bush tax cuts and housing boom, Obama here casts financial deregulation as something that happened only this decade, under Bush. It is true that several key deregulatory moves occurred this decade, including a little-noticed 2004 SEC decision that allowed investment banks to greatly increase their debt levels, which helped drive their move into mortgage securities. But other key actions occurred during the 1990s, such as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which took down the wall between commercial and investment banks and was supported by many Democrats in Congress and by Robert Rubin, mentor to many Obama economic advisers. Rubin also fought attempts to regulate credit default swaps, which played a big role in the current crisis.--Alec MacGillis

From earlier
"Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office."

That's going to be a tough one. President Obama wants to halve the national deficit over the next four years, largely by cutting spending in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and raising taxes. But Dave Walker, the former Comptroller General of the Government Accountability Office, warns that tax hikes and slashing war spending will barely make a dent in the deficit and debt without serious reform to government entitlement programs -- Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Without these reforms, Walker argues the debt will grow to 2.5 times the gross domestic product over the next 30 years, as the Baby Boomers enter the entitlement system. --Frank Ahrens

9:54 p.m.
"In this budget, we will end education programs that don't work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't need them."

We won't know the details backing up this claim until the budget is released. But it is doubtful that Obama will be able to save very much in cutting education programs, given that the bulk of the federal education budget goes into supplementary programs such as Title I, for schools with high levels of low-income students, and IDEA, for students with special needs. In fact, his stimulus plan increased funding in both of those areas.

Secondly, Obama's promise to attack subsidies for big agribusiness is undermined by the fact that he voted for the $290 billion farm bill in 2008, which, as critics like John McCain noted, continued big corporate subsidies.--Alec MacGillis

I guess we knew he was lying . . . after all, his lips were moving!  Bobby Jindal delivered the Republican response.  His delivery was characterized by most as less than stellar.  I've seen worse (remember, Obama was speaking to an adoring throng, Jindal to a camera lens).  The ideas of smaller government, tax cuts, school choice, personal responsibility and faith in the individual, not the state are good ones.  Yes, we've heard it before but it's been a while since we practiced it.  Though it may not be a new message, neither is socialism and that's what Obama was peddling!

 

UPDATE:

Here's another fact check from apnews.


02/25/2009, 01:41

by marleed
This blog entry will require very little reading!  All I'm requiring of you is a few moments of your time to look at a few pictures, and answer a couple of questions. Let us begin!



Funny, or offensive?



This one enrage you?



Or how about this one?

I suspect you might find these cariacatures to be mean spirited, but I doubt they'd provoke you to rage, or to call for the firing of the cartoon's creator. For eight years George Bush was compared to a monkey on a regular basis!  Ok, try this one!



Unlike the identity of the chimp in our first three cartoons, it may not be immediately clear who the dead chimp represents.  Read carefully!  "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill"  .  .  .  Which begs the question, WHO WROTE THE STIMULUS BILL?  Al Sharpton obviously thinks that Mr. O penned the pile of pooh.  And while I agree that Barry thinks the pile of pooh is positively perfect, it was not he who sat down and assembled these 1100 pages.  In fact, I bet Barry hasn't even read all 1100 pages!  But back to Al, who is obviously feeling ignored and neglected and who was just waiting for a moment like this to thrust himself back onto center stage.  He is certain that the chimp in this cartoon is B.H. Obama and that the cartoon's author (who he insists should be fired) is guilty of encouraging the assassination of the same.  I say, HOG WASH!  It's a cartoon which is uncomplimentary of the Stimulus Bill and the gaggle of liberals in Congress who wrote it.  The chimp represents a group of people, not just one. Get a grip!  But if offended is what you want to be, try this.



How's that grab you, Al?

(all of these cartoons and images were found doing a simple Google search, if you enjoy being offended, pull up Google and knock yourself out!)

02/24/2009, 11:20
3 comments 3 comments ( 34 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


As our country races down the road to socialism it would serve us well to reflect on what we ought to have already learned.   Please take 9 minutes to watch this cartoon from 1948, and after doing so . . .  THROW THOSE BOTTLES!

02/22/2009, 13:02
1 comment 1 comment ( 25 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


It is being widely reported that D.C. police will soon be making an arrest in the Chandra Levy murder case.  Levy was the Washington D.C. intern who was murdered in Rock Creek Park in April of 2001.

WASHINGTON — Police officials here are close to making an arrest in the killing of Chandra Levy, the former federal government intern whose disappearance in 2001 ended Gary A. Condit’s Congressional career after his relationship with her was revealed, several law enforcement officials familiar with the investigation said on Saturday.

Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier contacted Ms. Levy’s family on Friday to inform them that officials would be pressing charges, probably in the next several days.

Law enforcement officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because charges had not been filed, identified the suspect as Ingmar Guandique, 27, who has previously denied any involvement in Ms. Levy’s disappearance and killing.

STOP STOP STOP! .  .  .  While I'm happy that there may soon be a resolution to this case and some sort of closure for the Levy family, there is a not so small detail here that we must NOT ignore.  Who is this Ingmar Guandique?

Guandique is an illegal alien who had been offered a form of amnesty by the U.S. government.

Entered Illegally

In a statement released in response to questions from HUMAN EVENTS, the Eastern Region Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service said: "Our records indicate that Mr. Guandique entered the United States illegally but was eligible for an immigration benefit because of the designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals of El Salvador. He filed for that benefit and received work authorization while that application was pending. The application has subsequently been denied because Guandique failed to submit fingerprints."

President Bush decided to grant TPS status to illegal aliens from El Salvador on March 2 of last year after meeting with Salvadoran President Francisco Flores. According to a 1990 immigration law, the attorney general can certify illegal aliens as eligible for this status whenever he determines "they are temporarily unable to return to their.homelands" because of a war or natural disaster. In January and February 2001 there were earthquakes in El Salvador that killed hundreds of people. Bush determined that TPS status should be extended to Salvadoran illegal immigrants as a means of providing additional financial aid to the stricken country. "This will allow them to continue to work here and to remit some of their wages back home to support El Salvador's recovery efforts," Bush said at the time.

A few days after the President's decision, Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft issued regulations indicating that any Salvadoran who had been in the United States before February 13, 2001 could apply by September 9, 2002 to stay in the U.S. under TPS. While their TPS application were pending, they could apply for permission to legally work in the United States. Ashcroft estimated there were 150,000 potential applicants for the program.

Guandique was one of them-and, although the INS will not say when he applied, it must have been within weeks of beginning his crime spree.

NOT, may I say, one of George's finer moments!  We've heard this story over and over before.  And I hope I don't have to draw you a picture.  This is reason #1,348,  .  .  .  (oh hell, I'd lost count)  .  .  .  why blanket amnesty is a bad idea and why we need border security in the form of the mother of ALL fences.  The subject of amnesty and border security will soon be brought up again.  It is not likely that border security will be a priority of the Obama administration.  Be ready to voice your views!


02/22/2009, 12:36
2 comments 2 comments ( 23 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


. . . No, not that one!



No, no!  Not that one either!



That's the one!  And on this, his birthday, we would do well to read and think on his words.

The time is now near at hand which must probably determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their houses and farms are to be pillaged and destroyed, and themselves consigned to a state of wretchedness from which no human efforts will deliver them. The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die.

- Address to the Continental Army before the Battle of Long Island, 27 August 1776

His admonition seems to be appropriate to the situation we find ourselves in today.  Freemen or slaves of the state . . . the choice is ours!

02/22/2009, 11:12
1 comment 1 comment ( 18 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]


Back Next

powered by pppBLOG v 0.3.11