logo

Home / Stats / Contact Me / Login / Recommended Links
by marleed


The Illinois Senate wasted no time in removing Governor Rod Blogojevich from office.  The vote was unanimous.

Illinois senators stripped Rod Blagojevich of power Thursday in the final act of a political drama that handed the reins of state government to his estranged lieutenant, Pat Quinn, and will likely end Blagojevich's career in politics.

Senators voted unanimously to convict Blagojevich, 59-0 and shortly thereafter, Quinn was sworn in as Illinois' new governor.

The outcome was never in doubt. In fact, Quinn went to the state Capitol earlier in the day  in preparation of being sworn in.

The governor's impeachment was triggered by his arrest last month on a variety of federal corruption charges. The criminal complaint against him included a long list of shocking quotes that portrayed Blagojevich as trying to auction off President Obama's vacant U.S. Senate seat and pressure people for campaign donations.

The former governor had refused to take part in the trial, but he surprised everyone by asking to make a closing statement in which he insisted that he should not be tossed out of office on what he called incomplete evidence.

"You haven't proved a crime, and you can't because it didn't happen," Blagojevich pleaded with state senators. "How can you throw a governor out of office with insufficient and incomplete evidence?"

But state senators were unswayed. One by one, before casting their votes, they expressed their contempt for Blagojevich with a litany of names, calling him "dishonest," "devious," "corrupt," and a "hypocrite." 

It's now a matter of waiting to see if Patrick Fitzgerald proceeds with a criminal indictment.  Should that happen, Blogo may disclose details that could be very embarrassing to the Obama administration.  It seems unlikely that Blogojevich is the only one tainted by stench and filth of the cesspool that is Illinois politics.  He's just the only one to get caught .  .  .  so far.


01/29/2009, 19:48
6 comments 6 comments ( 50 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed



WASHINGTON — The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat

“He’s from Hawaii, O.K.?” said Mr. Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office next door to his boss. “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

I'm nearly (but not entirely) at a loss for words!  Are you kidding me?  We've been told that we must conserve energy and reduce our carbon foot print while B. Hussein Obama has to strip to the waist in the Oval Office because he keeps the thermostat at tropical levels!  I guess leading by example isn't in Mr. O's play book.  Why am I not surprised!?

I'll be right back .  .  .  I have to go adjust my thermostat!

*
Freezing death of Mich. man in house sparks anger

01/29/2009, 12:46
2 comments 2 comments ( 31 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


The evil deed is done (at least in the House).  The stimulus bill passed along party lines.  I'm happy to report that no Republicans voted for the bill.

In swift congressional action on a massive but disputed economic stimulus plan that the White House promises will deliver millions of jobs, the House approved the measure this evening by a 244 to 188 vote split along party lines.

The House vote marks the first tally on an $819-billion economic stimulus plan that President Barack Obama is pressing Congress to swiftly approve. The Senate is advancing its own version, with Obama calling on leaders to reach a compromise that he can sign before President's Day.

The House's Democratic leaders pushed the plan to the floor confident about holding the votes needed for passage without the support of Republicans complaining that the plan includes too much new government spending and not enough tax relief. Democrats fended off attempts to remove spending from the bill on the floor Wednesday.

Just 12 Democrats voted against the plan and no Republicans for it.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), led other GOP lawmakers in voicing the party's complaint about the measure: "The bill that's on the floor of the House as we speak we don't think will work and, frankly, (we) are disappointed in the product that we see: a lot of wasteful spending that won't create jobs and won't help preserve jobs in America. ''

While Obama has attempted to infuse the debate with an air of bipartisan cooperation, with the president traveling to Capitol Hill this week to meet exclusively with Republicans, the stimulus debate has pitted the majority Democrats against minority Republicans in pointed terms.

Thankfully this is hardly the bipartisan effort Obama was pushing for.  And it isn't over yet.  The Senate has yet to pass their version of the bill, and then there'll be the conference committee to come up with a final draft.  Your input is still of vital importance. Carry on!


01/28/2009, 19:08
2 comments 2 comments ( 49 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


A tongue in cheek look at Obama's interview with the Muslim media for your enjoyment and edification. (HT scrappleface.com)

01/28/2009, 16:21
1 comment 1 comment ( 15 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


.  .  . but desperate times require desperate measures. (HT exurbanleague.com)

01/28/2009, 15:14

by marleed



Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan's "lost decade" in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policy makers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.

This legislation is being railroaded through Congress.  We're being told that there is some sort of consensus about the need for quick, bold action involving massive governmental spending.  THIS IS NOT TRUE.  There may be consensus among the voices in BHO's head, but certainly not among economists. This bill takes us down a road we do NOT want to travel, and from which will find it impossible to return.  Make your voices heard.

01/28/2009, 12:09


Back Next

powered by pppBLOG v 0.3.11