logo

Home / Stats / Contact Me / Login / Recommended Links
by marleed


How can something that takes away freedom and gives you essentially no choice be called a "free choice act"?  Maybe bad drugs were involved?  Sick sense of humor, perhaps?  This misnamed piece of legislation could become law with the help of our friends, the Democrats, especially if they gain a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.

The so-called "Employee Free Choice Act," is as Orwellian a name for any law we've ever seen. The proposed law before Congress, in fact, is not about free choice at all; rather, it seeks to restrict the free choice of those who don't want to join a union, in a most underhanded way.

Democrats love the law for what it will do for their bread-and-butter Big Labor friends: It will take away employees' right to a secret ballot when voting on whether to form a union.

Democrats and union bosses know that public votes on unions will put crushing pressure on intimidated workers to vote in favor of forming or joining unions.

And what kind of reprisals might the workers risk if they vote against the union?

This is precisely what Big Labor bosses are demanding as payback from the large Democratic congressional majority that they helped get elected.

Apparently the Democrats don't care who they sell out as long as they win the election.  This time, they've REALLY made a deal with the devil.

Here's how it would work: Under current labor rules, if you are approached by a couple of burly, threatening-looking 200-pound guys asking you to sign a petition to establish a union shop at your place of work -- and you are opposed to the idea -- you can smile nicely and sign the petition, safe in the knowledge that you can vote against the union in the privacy of the voting booth. But under card check, you wouldn't get a chance to cast a secret ballot. The petition would empower labor bosses to form a union shop if more than 50 percent of workers signed on.

What could be more un-democratic than abolishing the secret ballot? That's what they do in dictatorships.

Union bosses claim that secret ballot elections are unfair because of management coercion and intimidation. This is simply not true. Government investigations have uncovered no evidence of widespread management abuse. And workers themselves say they have no problem with the National Labor Relations Board's oversight of union elections.

Seventy percent of union and non-union employees favor the secret ballot, but that matters not.  The objective here is to ensure that union membership increases while the power and wealth of union leadership does likewise. This is nothing more than an attempt to legalize worker intimidation.  It is an attempt that must fail. I suggest a call, FAX, or email to your Senators and Representative.  Allow me to quote Edmund Burke yet again, "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."  So don't just sit there, DO SOMETHING!


11/24/2008, 17:43
4 comments 4 comments ( 34 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


.  .  .  Yes, yes really he is!  He's promised us change. And change he'll deliver. He'll legislate your carbon footprint right out of existence!  No more gas guzzling, exhaust belching automobiles for you!!!!  So, in the interest of fairness, you might expect BO to arrive at his inauguration in a Saturn Vue.  You might expect it, but you'd be wrong.  President Obama's new limo is a modified black Cadillac (built like a tank) that'll pass anything on the highway but a gas station!  Of course security is of primary concern when it comes to transporting the leader of the free world.  I'm fine with that. But in light of our future leader's environmental plans for me and you, don't you think he could have gone for REAL change and chosen perhaps a modified Ford Mariner for his ride?  I guess change only applies to we the people.

And that's not fair!

11/23/2008, 16:27
1 comment 1 comment ( 3 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


This is a post I never wanted to write.  I don't even like thinking about it.  But as hard as I try to avoid it, reality has a way of reaching out, grabbing me by the shoulders, and shaking me like a rag doll! Consider me well shaken! The Intercollegiate Studies Institute did a study that measured national civic literacy. Guess what they found!? People are stupid.  And not just a few of them . . . election winning percentages of them!  But it gets worse!  The elected are often even more ignorant than the voters who elected them.  For example, did you know that the electoral college was established to supervise presidential debates?  Oh God, I hope not!  If you do, you're in the company of 20% of elected officials who took this exam . . . AND YOU'RE WRONG! (I need to go lie down!)  Here's a little more.

US elected officials scored abysmally on a test measuring their civic knowledge, with an average grade of just 44 percent, the group that organized the exam said Thursday.

Ordinary citizens did not fare much better, scoring just 49 percent correct on the 33 exam questions compiled by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI).

"It is disturbing enough that the general public failed ISI's civic literacy test, but when you consider the even more dismal scores of elected officials, you have to be concerned," said Josiah Bunting, chairman of the National Civic Literacy Board at ISI.

Disturbing doesn't cover it!

"How can political leaders make informed decisions if they don't understand the American experience?" he added.

Now there's a head scratcher.  I think my response to that would be... They can't!  Raise your hand if  you're worried!


11/22/2008, 23:30
4 comments 4 comments ( 112 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


Here's a headline that caught my eye.


Wow, there's a shocker!  But even more surprising was the next sentence.

Because of escalating piracy, Africa’s high seas are fast becoming dominated by foreign navies, raising questions about African countries’ ability to secure their own waters.

Who's raising questions?  Why would anyone raise questions?  Does anyone seriously think that East African countries can secure the waters off their shores?  Take for example Kenya.  Kenya's Navy consists of three inner tubes,  two bath tubs, and an old chest freezer.



.  .  .  Ok, I exaggerate, but only slightly.  Here's a legitimate inventory of Kenya's Navy.

  • Training vessel KNS Nyati was donated by the Royal Navy in 1964. It was formerly known HMS Aberford. [3] It was sold for scrapping in 1971.
  • Patrol crafts KNS Simba, KNS Nyati and KNS Chui were delivered from Britain in 1966. These ships were built by Vosper Thornycroft. KNS Simba was decommissioned in 1997. [4]
  • Madaraka Class missile boats KNS Harambee, KNS Jamhuri KNS Madaraka and KNS Mamba were delivered in 1976 and built by Brooke Marine. [5] KNS Jamhuri and KNS Harambee were decommissioned in 2002. [6]
  • Nyayo Class warships KNS Nyayo, KNS Shujaa, KNS Shupavu and KNS Umoja were delivered in 1986. [3]
  • Galana Class landing ships KNS Tana and KNS Galana were delivered in December 1993 from Spain. [2]

WHAT KIND OF CONTROL DO YOU THINK THEY CAN MAINTAIN OVER THEIR COASTAL WATERS?!  . . . Forgive me,  dumb questions have a tendency to make me crazy.  The World is being victimized by these Islamo fascist heathens, and the World needs to respond.  Africa can focus on feeding her hungry, healing her sick,  housing her homeless, and halting the genocide on the continent that persists to this very hour.   The rest of the civilized world ought to be filling the waters off the coast of Africa with an obscene number of ships.  .  . Send battle ships,  destroyers, aircraft carriers.  Send anything capable of firing projectiles that go BOOM and either eliminate the pirates, or convince them get out of the pirating business.  I realize this is a difficult task, but having World commerce held hostage is a big, no it's a HUGE problem that needs to be solved yesterday!


11/21/2008, 23:58

by marleed


Sarah Palin is an equal opportunity threat.  Old guard politicians of both the left and the right find her intimidating.  She's been called ignorant, stupid, greedy, unrefined, opportunistic, clearly not ready of national office, and did I mention stupid!?  Sarah is not of the elite ruling class, which is pretty much just fine as, according to our Founding Fathers, there wasn't supposed to be an "elite ruling class". (memo: watch 'Mr. Smith Goes to Washington', read the writings of Ben, George, John, & James... rinse and repeat).   Sarah Palin is one of us.  We need a LOT more of "US" in Washington.  So support and encourage Sarah Palin and those like her.  We can take this country back... yes, we can!

11/21/2008, 21:31
1 comment 1 comment ( 7 views )  |  [ 0 trackbacks ]

by marleed


WASHINGTON, Nov. 20, 2008 –

Military Family Appreciation Week begins tomorrow, and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, issued a message today noting the observance. Here is the text of the chairman’s message:

“This month, as we celebrate our blessings, and give thanks for our freedom to enjoy them, we take great pride in honoring November 21-28, 2008 as Military Family Appreciation Week.

“Families serve just as their uniformed service members do. And the military family has rarely faced as many challenges as our families do today. After seven years of war, hundreds of thousands of families have served through multiple deployments in support of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, as well as many other locations throughout the globe.

“But the love and support of our military families do more than allow us to serve abroad. Our families serve at the very center of American society. They are the bedrock of a free republic which provides for a common defense – and their commitment to the values of hard work, self-sacrifice, and moral virtue is a source of great pride and inspiration for us all.

Thank you from a grateful nation!


11/21/2008, 18:10


Back Next

powered by pppBLOG v 0.3.11